Whether we like to admit it or not, the current trend for “bigger is better”, . when it refers to the diamond . rings worn by .. is having an impression on what we are buying
Celebrity engagement rings – are you a slave to celebrity trends?
Whether we like to admit it or not, the voguish trend for “bigger is better”, particularly when it refers to the diamond chore rings worn by celebrities, is having an impression on what we are buyingAccording to Celeste Ohrens, from New York Diamond Traders, “In the six months subsequent JLo’s occupation to Ben Affleck, we sold further pink diamonds than we’d sold in the previous six years!”And despite the truth that THAT occupation ring has been replaced with another equally stunning jewel, copies of JLo’s six-carat pink diamond are stagnant selling well at many Internet jewelers.When Marilyn Monroe breathlessly purred “Diamonds are a Girl’s Best Friend” (as if we didn’t already know!), I hold no distrust women everywhere secretly coveted the baubles Ms Monroe wore, but such flashy displays of excess would hold offended the sensibilities of any self-respecting 1950s homemakerNot so nowadays We’ve come to expect the ultimate in sort and quantity, and if that equates to wearing a 3-carat diamond round alike to that worn by our favorite celebrity, more strength to us!Whether celebrities are pragmatic as the arbiters or slaves to all that is considered stylish, the task rings gracing the left drudge of such stars as Catherine Zeta-Jones, Madonna and Ashley Judd attest to the fact that their alternative of ball ornament is influencing (or is influenced by) modern trends.Jewelers like David Feinstein from Feinstein & Co, Boston, chatter “The hottest look in task rings at the moment is the revival of antique groove diamonds and we are trying desperately to meet demand”, forging Catherine Zeta-Jones’s antique-style 10-carat marquise-cut diamond ring, Madonna’s 3-stone Edwardian-style ring and Ashley Judd’s antique pave-set diamond orb hot favorites when it comes to replicationThe size of the diamond is furthermore influencing modern styles, and according to the Diamond Information Center, the traditional one carat jewel diamond duty orb has now grown to three and four carats One only had to watcher the jaw dropping demonstrate of gems at this year’s Oscars – some $40 million worth – to reinforce the concept that in the minds of most celebrities “bigger is better” Never character that their cherished booty had to be retaliated to the vaults from whence they came following morningBut our ever-increasing fascination with all things “bling” begs the problem “What about the poor sucker who has to PAY for this excess?” The traditional measurement for any would-be suitor to determine how much he should be open to allowance with for the job ball was arbitrarily congeal at three months’s salary, which is fine if he’s earning a healthy six-figure salary. But try telling Joe Schmo, whose monthly ration doesn’t increase much beyond the local Thai take-out, that he’s up for what could be many thousands of dollars, and you’ll see his front (not to name his wallet) crumble.Which brings me to my modern dab The value of your occupation round is not aptly measured in money terms nor is it measured by whether your best friend’s diamond is bigger, or whiter, or other extravagant. And it’s absolutely not measured by whether it looks fair like JLo’s most ended accessory (and I mean the ring, not the husband!)Your occupation round is a measure of the value of your relationship and what it routine to both of you, now and in the future It’s a number of all that the two of you share, whether you’re wearing a 2-carat rock or a dime-store copyJust remember, your local jeweler is probably a whiz at re-modelling, so you can always elevate later!